Thursday 2014/11/27

Tibet / Exile Tibet

Ellen Bork of FPI Calls for New Approach to Tibet

Protesters take part in a solidarity march from the Chinese Consulate to the United Nations (UN) Headquarters in support of Tibet in New York, December 10, 2012. The march also aims to brings to attention a string of self-immolations that have taken placeProtesters take part in a solidarity march from the Chinese Consulate to the United Nations (UN) Headquarters in support of Tibet in New York, December 10, 2012. The march also aims to brings to attention a string of self-immolations that have taken place
x
Protesters take part in a solidarity march from the Chinese Consulate to the United Nations (UN) Headquarters in support of Tibet in New York, December 10, 2012. The march also aims to brings to attention a string of self-immolations that have taken place
Protesters take part in a solidarity march from the Chinese Consulate to the United Nations (UN) Headquarters in support of Tibet in New York, December 10, 2012. The march also aims to brings to attention a string of self-immolations that have taken place

Ellen Bork, democracy and human rights director at Foreign Policy Initiative called on the United States to rethink its policies on Tibet in a Wall Street Journal op-ed. Urging a new approach to address the “never ending cycle of repression,” Ellen asks “[w]hat if Tibet's claim to independence had been preserved rather than conceded?”

The Tuesday op-ed postulated a need for "new thinking to address the escalating suffering in Tibet" and a better understanding of the west's acquiscene in China's claim of rule in Tibet.

“It is time for a review of these policies and their effectiveness as well as new thinking to address the escalating suffering in Tibet,” Ellen wrote.

Ellen suggested that the U.S., its European allies, Japan and India back the Dalai Lama's access to international leaders and endorse his future reincarnation plans, and "establish regular contacts" to work with the Tibetan administration in Dharamsala to "engage with Beijing on solutions for the future."

"Understanding how the world acquiesced in communist China's subjugation of Tibet and the ineffective policies that flowed from that decision should enable the U.S. and other democracies to recover the principle American diplomats expressed in the 1950s, the right of Tibetans to determine the future of their homeland," said Ellen.

Listen to the report in Tibetan
PT - West Should End its Acquiescence to Beijing Claim to Tibt Rulei
|| 0:00:00
...    
🔇
X
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Wangchuk from: NYC
21.12.2012 23:39
Nearly all independent Tibetologists agree that Tibet was independent from at least 1913-1951 & prior to the late 18th century. The Qing ruled Tibet as a vassal state but never considered Tibet a part of China. The ROC never had any control over Tibet's internal or external affairs. The PRC only gained overlordship of Tibet by an invasion of the PLA.

Latest News

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Headline News Nov 24, 2014i
X
24.11.2014
ཁམས་དར་རྩེ་མདོའི་ས་ཡོམ། རང་ལུས་མེར་སྲེག་པ་ནང་མིར་རྩིས་སྤྲོད། ཧིན་དྷུའི་ཚོགས་ཆེན་ལ་ཆིབས་སྒྱུར། ཨི་རེན་གྱི་རྡུལ་ཕྲན་གྲོས་མོལ། ཨ་ཧྥི་གྷན་གྱི་འབར་གས་གཏོར་རྒོལ། ཨ་རིའི་སྲིད་འཛིན་གཞོན་པ་ཕྱོགས་སྐྱོད།